Americas
Steve Washburn
The national authorities of Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden submitted a proposal to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to restrict per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) under REACH, the European Union’s (EU) chemicals regulation.
This article provides a summary of the proposal document and potential implications.
ECHA published this detailed proposal on 7 February 2023: ECHA publishes PFAS restriction proposal.
The restriction proposal "is tailored to address the manufacture, placing on the market, as well as the use of PFASs as such and as constituents in other substances, in mixtures and in articles above a certain concentration”. It proposes the broadest substances ban ever in the EU, incorporating an expanded definition of PFAS that potentially applies to around 10,000 substances. The restriction also applies to the importation of PFAS to the EU.
PFAS are used extensively in commerce and industry. Many of our clients are asking what this restriction proposal could mean for their business and its potential implications for their products or supply chain.
ECHA’s scientific committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) will consider whether the proposed restrictions meet the legal requirements of REACH in March 2023. If they do, the committees will begin their scientific evaluation of the proposal.
The opinions of RAC and SEAC are normally ready within 12 months from the start of the scientific evaluation. However, in view of the complexity of the proposal and the extent of information that is expected in the public consultation that that runs alongside the scientific evaluation, the committees may need more time to finalise their opinions.
A six-month public consultation period starts on 22 March 2023. ECHA will hold an online information session on 5 April via their website https://echa.europa.eu/home to explain the restriction process and how to participate in the consultation.
For specific advice relative to your situation, contact Ramboll: pfas@ramboll.com
1 This often includes a comprehensive assessment of information to identify known and potential PFAS uses that would fall within the proposed restriction.
Companies that manufacture, use, import or bring to market PFAS or articles containing PFAS in the European Union would be affected by the proposed ban.
PFAS are used in a broad set of industry sectors. A non-exhaustive summary is provided below:
Initial inspiration from: Publication (bdi.eu)
The chemical scope of the restriction proposal is defined as: “Any substance that contains at least one fully fluorinated methyl (CF3-) or methylene (-CF2-) carbon atom (without any H/Cl/Br/I attached to it)”. The scope is aligned with the OECD definition of PFAS that was published in 2021.
There are, however, a few exceptions. The proposal document says: “This definition encompasses more than 10,000 PFAS, including a few fully degradable PFAS subgroups. As these fully degradable subgroups, which can be described by their key structural elements, do not fulfil the underlying concern of high persistence [in the environment], they are excluded from the scope.”
An exact chemical definition of the exempted subgroups is given in the proposal document.
Two restriction options have been assessed by the dossier submitters. Restriction option 1 (RO1) is a full ban with no derogations (exemptions) and a transition period of 18 months. Restriction option 2 (RO2) is a full ban with use-specific, time-limited derogations and a transition period of 18 months plus either a five- or 12-year derogation period.
The dossier submitters have stated that RO2 is the most balanced option, but further information is needed to decide upon the derogations, making engagement during the public consultation phase by affected parties important.
RO2 proposes that, from 18 months after the entry into force of the restriction, PFAS, as defined under the chemical scope above, shall not be manufactured, used or placed on the market as substances on their own, or placed on the market in another substance as a constituent, a mixture or an article in a concentration of or above:
All uses of PFAS are covered by RO2, unless there is a proposed derogation. Importantly, the restriction proposal identifies some potential derogations that it does not yet recommend, due to what it calls a “lack of evidence”.
Companies with an interest in these derogations – or indeed that wish to propose any additional derogations that are not yet included – need to provide substantial evidence during the public consultation phase.
The potential derogations requiring additional evidence are:
Note: The restrictions would not apply to PFAS used as active substances in biocidal products, plant protection products or human and veterinary medicinal products, as these are addressed under their respective existing regulations.
The proposed restrictions may also have implications for company owners, investors, their legal teams and other stakeholders. They underscore the importance of strategic planning and appropriately managing potential risks and liabilities, especially during due diligence and transactions, in situations where PFAS are part of operations.
Companies may need to:
If you need assistance with PFAS issues, please contact us at pfas@ramboll.com.
We work with companies around the world, helping them navigate and comply with PFAS regulations, including the new restriction proposal in the EU. From advice on obligations and strategic planning to technical analysis, support and troubleshooting, we provide comprehensive compliance services tailored to meet our clients’ very different needs around PFAS, which can include:
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
EIF - entry into force
EU - European Union
FKM - Family of fluorocarbon-based fluoroelastomer materials
HFO - hydrofluoroolefin
kV - kilovolt
mg - milligram
PFAS - per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
ppb - parts per billion
ppm - parts per million
PCTFE - polychlorotrifluoroethylene
PTFE - polytetrafluoroethylene
PVDF - polyvinylidene fluoride
RAC - ECHA’s scientific committee for risk assessment
RO - restriction option
SEAC - ECHA’s scientific committee for socio-economic analysis
The information contained and opinions expressed herein: (i) are for discussion/informational purposes only, without representation or warranty; (ii) are general in nature, may not be applicable to your particular circumstances, and cover subject matters for which information and practices may change/develop quickly over time; and, therefore, (iii) should not be relied upon for any particular circumstances without consulting an environmental professional experienced in both PFAS and the specific issues related to your matter.
Email us at pfas@ramboll.com or contact your local expert.
Enter your details here to stay in touch with Ramboll on PFAS.
We will invite you to PFAS-related webinars and include you on PFAS-related developments and regulatory updates.
You can opt out at any time.
For more than two decades, Ramboll has helped clients around the world resolve their most critical PFAS issues. Our multi-disciplinary expertise and experience has been instrumental in assisting clients in reducing a wide range of risk and liabilities related to PFAS source treatment and control, site remediation, product safety and stewardship, regulatory compliance and environmental due diligence.
For more information on Ramboll’s experience and capabilities, see www.ramboll.com/pfas